Startups & founders
Something real in front of users in weeks.
MVPs built to be thrown away or grown, plus the founder-led content that raises the round and the analytics that tell you what is working.
What usually goes wrong
- A runway that does not survive a six-month build
- Needing to show investors a working product, not a deck
- A founder who should be the channel but has no system for it
- No instrumentation, so growth claims are guesses
Recognise any of these?
Tell us which one is costing you most right now. We will say plainly whether it is worth fixing, and roughly what it takes.
Questions
The things people ask before they enquire.
It depends on scope, but we will give you a number before you commit to anything. Most engagements start with a paid discovery — a fixed fee, a week or two — which ends in a written scope and a real budget. If the budget does not work, you leave with the scope document and no obligation to continue.
A typical first ship is around six weeks. Larger builds run in two-week cycles after that, each ending in a demo of something that actually runs. You will know within the first cycle whether the timeline is holding, rather than finding out near the deadline.
The people you meet. The lead on your project is someone who builds, and they stay on it from the first call to the last deploy. There is no account manager relaying messages between you and an unseen team.
You own everything — code, assets, accounts, domains. We hand over with documentation and a walkthrough, and your team can run it without calling us. If you would rather we stayed on for maintenance or a next phase, that is a separate agreement, not something buried in the original contract.
Yes. Most of our work is remote, and we keep a few hours of overlap with your working day for calls. Timezone has not been the hard part; unclear scope has.